I have often heard it
said that North and South is like Pride and Prejudice. I do not agree with
this. I have also heard it said that North
and South is like a darker version of Pride
and Prejudice. I do not agree with this, either (although it is indeed darker). And I shall endeavor to
explain why, as I have now just finished North
and South (hereafter to be abbreviated to N&S, and Pride and Prejudice will be P&P) and therefore have sufficient
knowledge of the story. I never trusted myself to try and write this post just
based on the movie, you know.
(If you do not know these stories already, here is your spoiler warning.)
First of all, I shall
list what I believe people base their comparison on, then I shall address the
points, and then mention other differences.
Similarities (or what
people might consider to be similarities):
1. The general storyline of both is something like this: a
man and a woman meet, are not really impressed with each other in their own
ways, but the man grows to love the woman and the woman to become more
displeased with the man, then he proposes, is rejected, but continues to love
her and eventually she finds out what a good guy he his and they finally come
to an understanding intending marriage.
2. The heroine is prejudiced and the hero
is proud.
3. There is also another man in the story
from whom the heroine receives an offer of marriage, which she of course rejects.
4. The hero has a relation who disapproves
of the match and at some point has a confrontation with the heroine.
5. The heroines both have an ailing mother
who complains a lot.
6. There is a chapter in N&S called "First Impressions" which was P&P's original title.
7. The heroines are both named Elizabeth.
(JOKING, I’m joking…although apparently that’s what whoever made this
wallpaper/background thought!)
And now I shall
address each one of those. Except 7, of course.
1 and 2—These are the
ones that probably most everything is actually founded on; the others, I was
just trying to think of any possibilities that people could consider. But you
will notice that when I wrote the story themes in that description I had to use
very general terms. This is because the stories are so unlike each other. This
very general storyline is, I daresay, very popular, and these are not the only
two authors who have used it. (Although the Janeite in me must point out that Jane
Austen did it first. :D)
But anyways. First of
all, if a comparison is to be made, I’d have to say that Margaret Hale’s
sentiments were actually much more similar to Mr. Darcy’s than Elizabeth
Bennet’s, which points out a dissimilarity to begin with. Margaret, we must
understand, was brought up as a gentleman’s daughter even though her father is
in reduced circumstances; although he was never a gentleman of leisure, his
profession was one of the ones accepted by The Gentry, and she had been brought up as
a little girl with her rich relatives during the school years in London. When
she came to Milton she found what she perceived to be a deal of vulgarity, as
Mr. Darcy probably thought about some of the people in Hertfordshire. Margaret
found Mr. Thornton himself not to be as polished as she liked, although mostly
she was prejudiced because he was a tradesman, or one could also say she was
being prideful to look down upon them. Mr. Darcy did not actually find
Elizabeth herself to be what he felt was beneath his notice—it was her family.
Also, the sentiments of Elizabeth and Margaret were quite different. What I said in the description there was not actually quite true on Margaret's account; she did not really grow to dislike Mr. Thornton more before he proposed. She had a little esteem that sort of went off and on, and if anything she might have thought a little better of him at that point than she did to begin with.
Speaking of which, the characters of the heroines and heroes are just so completely different from each other in the two stories. Especially Elizabeth and Margaret. Waaaaay different personalities going on. Since their temperaments and outlooks on life are so different, it's another thing that makes the stories differ.
And about the pride
and prejudice thing. The fact is, Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth both exhibit both
traits themselves, and though some people attribute pride to Mr. Darcy and
prejudice to Elizabeth, they both have a their share of both. Think about how
Mr. Darcy was prejudiced coming to “an assembly such as this” in Meryton. (It’s
obviously pointed out that he is proud, so I need not go into that.) He was
also prejudiced as to Jane Bennet, believing that she did not really care for
Mr. Bingley, rather because that is what he expected. Elizabeth was not really
prejudiced about Mr. Darcy until he slighted her at the Meryton ball, which was
a founded prejudice, if you ask me. Then she heard the untruth concerning Mr.
Wickham and believed it. (You don’t see anything like this in N&S—if anybody
is ever mistaken about the other, it is Mr. Thornton mistaken about Margaret
and her brother, so there again we have the heroes and heroines not matching up
between the two stories.) Then think of her reaction to his proposal. Remember
that “had not your pride been hurt by my honest confession of the scruples that had long prevented my forming any serious design”? Or when
Elizabeth herself said “I could more easily forgive his pride, if he had not mortified mine.” There, Elizabeth herself just pointed out that they were
both proud in their ways. Although she was half-joking there, and did not
think pride was an admirable trait. That doesn't mean she didn't have it, though.
But back to what I
was saying before. As for Mr. Thornton, I would have to say he didn’t
demonstrate much prejudice, although he could be called proud in his way.
One could try to draw
a similarity between Mr. Darcy saving Elizabeth’s honor by settling the affair
with Lydia and Wickham and Mr. Thornton saving Margaret’s honor by making sure
there was not an inquest in the affair with her and her brother (though he did
not know it was her brother) at the station. Well, those were not at all the
same when you get down to the technicalities. For one thing, in P&P Elizabeth became even more attached to Mr.
Darcy after he did that for her family (for her, in point of fact); in N&S Margaret’s true
feelings are rather unclear, but what she feels the most in the situation is
mortification that Mr. Thornton should know that she lied. They’re just
completely different situations. Mr. Darcy did it for Elizabeth with the full
knowledge that it was because he loved her and wanted to save her from scandal;
Mr. Thornton tried to convince himself first that he's doing it not for her sake really, but because of what he 'used to' feel for her (heh, heh, heh...) and finally he decides upon using his friendship with her father as an excuse. (Yeah, he's doing it for Mr. Hale. Uh-huh.) However, Mr. Darcy knew Elizabeth was blameless, whereas Mr. Thornton all along
was tormented by the probability that Margaret was not at all blameless.
Then Mr. Thornton
goes on to explain to Margaret that all his feelings are passed, of course, and
that he didn’t really do it for her—pretty much the exact opposite of Mr.
Darcy. (Although in the book we see that all along Mr. Thornton loved Margaret
and this time, so HE who lied too… ahem. Oh Mr. Advocate for Truth, take a look
at your own self.)
Furthermore, a big
part of the story in P&P is that Mr. Darcy was struggling against his own better
judgment to lower himself enough to actually acknowledge his feelings for
Elizabeth. In N&S it wasn’t this way at all; Mr. Thornton knew that
Margaret probably considered herself above him
and if he hesitated in his affection it was because he felt she could never
care for him.
They both deal with
social class, yes. But it’s on a different plane entirely. P&P is all about
The Gentry. N&S has a great deal to do with tradesmen
manufacturers.
As for the rest of
the story, it is all so different. Not only is it “darker,” it’s just…
different. Margaret’s family situation, for starters. Mr. Thornton is a great
friend of Mr. Hale and pays kind attentions to Mrs. Hale when she’s ill and all
that. The main driving force in the story, I would say, is how Margaret adapts
to living somewhere and being with people totally different than what she had
experienced so far, and facing lots and lots of change in her life that forces
her to lose the simplicity of her former existence. There isn’t anything like
that in P&P at all; I would say the
they-don’t-like-each-other-oh-wait-now-he-likes-her-but-she-doesn't-like-him-but-then-she-discovers-she’s-wrong-and-it-ends-happily
is a bigger deal in P&P.
Now that almost makes
it seem like I’m bashing P&P or something, but trust me when I say I’m not
trying to do that AT ALL. P&P is my favorite book, my favorite story in the
world. I much, much prefer it to N&S. I like the “Light & Bright &
Sparkling”-ness of it. It’s so cleverly devised and wittily written, and not at
all cheesy or silly, as somebody who gets the wrong impression from very little
knowledge of it might think. I greatly admire N&S and think it’s a
marvelous and clever story, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. But I couldn’t have a
steady diet of it. It’s much too heavy and could be tiring if one has an
overdose of it. I cannot imagine having an overdose of P&P. ;)
I wish I knew whether
Elizabeth Gaskell liked Jane Austen… I haven’t been able to find out. Does
anybody know? I know that Mrs. Gaskell was actually acquainted and friends with
Charlotte Bronte, who is infamous for not liking Jane Austen, but I suppose it
does not necessarily follow that Elizabeth Gaskell doesn’t like her. One CAN be
friends despite one liking Jane Austen and the other disliking her…
…or can they?
Kidding. Sort of.
And now, since I have
run out of rambles, I’ll move on to point number 3.
Mr. Collins and Henry
Lennox are two very, very different matters. Mr. Collins is a wife-hunter
and—well, we all know what he is. Icky. Henry Lennox, on the other hand, is a
respectable young man whom Margaret actually likes—but not in that way. He
would annoy her as a husband. Also, he is not a wife-hunter at all; it’s one of
those cases where a man doesn't believe in thinking about marriage until he's 'made himself', but then meets with a woman who changes
his mind. Unfortunately for him, he has to be disappointed.
Now, personally I
don’t much like Henry. He rather annoys me. I think I would like the book’s
Henry a great deal more than the movie’s, but… still can't say I exactly like him. But anyway, he is not at all repulsive.
Like Mr. Collins.
4 - We all know how
different this is. I just stuck that in there for fun. The reason Mrs. Thornton
confronted Margaret was not at all similar to why Lady Catherine visited
Elizabeth. I don’t even need to explain if you know the stories.
And as for 5… Mrs.
Hale and Mrs. Bennet, two very different cases. Mrs. Hale did complain a lot
about Helstone when they lived there, but of course regretted it later on when
she had Milton to deal with. And Mrs. Hale really WAS ailing, whereas Mrs.
Bennet was what they call a hypochondriac.
Number 6 is not anything to dispute, just a trivia fact.
If you were comparing the mini-series of N&S with P&P, you might say that something happened at the beginning of the heroine's acquaintances with the heroes to immediately promote a dislike, but as this is not the way it was in the book of N&S, I say it can't be counted. ;)
In short, the stories themselves are so very, very different and have traits all their own that though a few comparisons can be made, it is not sufficient to make them similar enough to be mentioned hand-in-hand as I have seen done.
There now. That,
everybody, is my opinion. Do any of you agree with me? Of course, you may tell
me if you disagree too, although that will provoke me to argue my case and I do
so hate debating. :P
(I am only teasing.
Do not mind me. I mean, I do dislike debating, but I'm not forbidding you to say you disagree. Haha.)
